Session 4

Introductory Remarks

Before we leave the introductory chapters of the text it is time for a brief review of some of the basics. Think about these questions:

  1. Are you able to differentiate between the types of evaluation and assessment that take place within a classroom and Program Evaluation?
  2. Have you created a good definition for yourself of the terms Program and Evaluation separately and Program Evaluation as a phrase?
  3. Can you articulate the value of Program Evaluation as a formative and summative activity and why decision makers and stakeholders should be interested in the outcomes of formal, well designed, credible Program Evaluation studies?
  4. Have you thought about the ‘political’ aspects of Program Evaluation such as advocacy, fulfilling predetermined decisions, etc.
  5. Do you recognize the importance of identifying the “object” of the Program Evaluation, the development of the design of the study, the process of data collection and analysis and ultimately reporting findings and conclusions?

These ideas and more were introduced in the early readings and are the context for the study of the various approaches to conducting Program Evaluation studies.

Figure 3.1 Distribution of Five Evaluation Approaches on the dimension of Utilitarian to Intuitionist-Pluralist Evaluation is an excellent advanced organizer for the following chapters. It provides the context for understanding the value and purpose of each of the Program Evaluation approaches described in the following chapters. I suggest that as you read through these chapters you refer back to this diagram to remind yourself where the approaches lies on this continuum..

Required Readings and Assignments

The required reading for Session Four consists of Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 of the Fitzpatrick, Sanders and Worthen text.

The assignment for Session Four is to follow the instructions given in the Chapter/Readings Review assignment. The deadline date is May 18, 2009.



Recommended Readings